Jul. 5th, 2007 05:23 pm
so here they come, the sound of drums...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, this post on female characters in fandom by
fabu came up on
metafandom, and I read it and it's very interesting and well-thought out and inspired that thing I do every so often where I examine my own biases in fictional characters.
There are exactly two fictional characters that I outright hate. That's Dylan Hunt (Andromeda) and Ana-Lucia Cortez (Lost).
There's a longer list of characters that I dislike or am actively disinterested in. (Is that possible? To be actively disinterested in someone?) Anyway: Rose Tyler (Doctor Who, dislike), Jack Shepherd and Kate Austen (Lost, disinterest), Peter Petrelli and Claire Bennett (Heroes, disinterest), Liz Parker and Max Evans (Roswell, varies depending on the episode), Monica Reyes and John Doggett (The X-Files, disinterest), Gwen Cooper and Owen Harper (Torchwood, disinterest towards Gwen, dislike towards Owen).
...wow, this is the first time that I realized I tend to dislike characters in pairs. And apparently, usually couples that are either canon or popular fanon.
Anyway. Now I'm looking for patterns. Starting with my two top-hated characters, Dylan and Ana-Lucia. What do they have in common? Well, they're both leaders (nominally, anyway). They're both assertive. They bothheap verbal and occasionally physical abuse on their support team are verbally aggressive. Draw.
Dylan's sexually promiscuous and irresponsible. (*cough* Mad to be Saved *cough) Ana-Lucia, on the other hand, is sexually confident but I wouldn't call her promiscuous or particularly irresponsible. She does sleep with Sawyer, which isn't the smartest move in the world to make, but others have made the same mistake before and after her, and it's not like Sawyer's incapable of saying no (unlike, say, Angelika...I really do loathe the episode MtbS). Which makes Dylan worse.
Ana-Lucia is overly reliant on guns. Dylan is overly reliant onforcelances kickass warships who are smarter than he is forcelances. Also guns. Draw.
Ana-Lucia killed a character I love (namely, Shannon) and failed to show any particular remorse about it. Dylan offered to help save Earth, failed to actually do anything about it, and failed to show any particular remorse. Draw.
There are superficial alt-gender parallels drawn in the text for both of them. Beka could be considered a female Dylan with fewer moral compunctions. The reason this doesn't hold up is that Beka, while sexually confident and certainly more promiscuous than Ana-Lucia, has never slept with someone who was incapable of saying no, and usually manages to find a better way of comforting Harper than "Well, lots more people are dying and it's all your fault LOLS." Ana-Lucia has often been referred to as the female counterpart of Sawyer, and that's a much closer comparison. It falls down, of course, when you realize that Sawyer is presented as a criminal with a dubious moral compass, and Ana-Lucia is presented as a cop who presumably understands the difference between right and wrong. This bothers me. I think if Ana-Lucia had not been a cop I could have understood her killing that guy in flashback more. Anyway, that's a draw.
Which works out to Dylan being worse than Ana-Lucia. Which means either a) gender plays no role in my anticharacter biases, b) I'm predisposed to dislike men more than women, or c) Dylan was written worse. Reading
metafandom tells me that it's unlikely to be a if I was raised in 20th century USA, which I was.
metafandom also tells me that b is unlikely. So it's probably c.
That's fairly straightforward, right?
Now, the characters I dislike/am disinterested in.
Rose Tyler (dislike): I could tell you it's because the rabid, batshit part of Rose's fanbase turned me off her, but the truth is I dislike Rose because she was mean to Mickey and I overidentify with Mickey, so she was therefore mean to me. And I'm twenty and I hold grudges.
Jack Shepherd and Kate Austen (disinterest): They're so...generic. I don't actually know. Jack is Well Meaning Doctor Who Had Demons In His Past. Kate is Well Meaning Fugitive With Heart Of Gold. Or something. Kate particularly feels inconsistent to me, especially when placed against Claire, Shannon, and Sun, whose personalities I actually understand? Sun deciding to cheat on Jin because he had changed since their marriage felt human to me. Claire deciding to give up her baby because she didn't want to be a single mother was understandable. Shannon losing out on all her dreams and turning to conning Boone for revenge on Sabrina was sad but it made sense. Kate deciding to kill her stepfather because OMG he's actually her biological dad and I CAN'T STAND SHARING GENES WITH YOU!!1!...um...not so much with the understandable. Jack doesn't have anything that ridiculous to excuse, but his only motive seems to be to fix people because he can't fix himself which...doesn't sit well with me, because people should have more complicated motives than that.
Peter Petrelli and Claire Bennett (disinterest): Again with the generic. Also, Peter is emo and rarely seems to accomplish anything, while Claire is your basic cookie-cutter Cheerleader With A Secret.
Liz Parker and Max Evans (varies): When Kyle and Tess (or Alex and Isabel, or Michael and Maria) are doing something interesting/awesome, then I am disinterested in Liz and Max. When Tess is asking "What happens now, Max?" or Kyle is stalking Liz or Maria and Michael are whining about how they want to be Max and Liz, then I actively dislike them. Because the rest of the characters are fairly awesome (and OMG why did they make Emilie de Ravin leave???) and Max and Liz are...generic Romeo & Juliet with alien angst pastede on yay! And Romeo and Juliet were stupid teenagers who let themselves be ruled by hormones. Not one of my favorite character templates.
Monica Reyes and John Doggett (disinterest): Plain, simple, what-happened-to-the-show-I-signed-on-for? I actually never gave Doggett and Reyes a shot on their own terms, and I can admit it. I also never really intend to. I signed on for Mulder, Scully, the Gunmen, and aliens. Not Reyes and Doggett.
Gwen Cooper and Owen Harper (disinterest towards Gwen, dislike towards Owen): Gwen is a fairly personality-less template character. The Heart Of The Team Who Humanizes Them. Aside from her affair. Cheating on Rhys was possibly a sound dramatic choice to make, as it gave her a dimension outside of The Heart Of The Team Who Humanizes Them, but c'mon, Rhys is nearly as awesome as Mickey and deserved better. Owen I actively dislike because...first of all, the alien pheremones in the first episode. Date rape jokes are not funny, and the fact that he never got any dramatic comeuppance drives me crazy. And then there's his heartlessness towards Tosh (Need a hand getting it up? If I did, I wouldn't ask you.) and Tosh I adore. And then he rips open the Rift for someone he barely knew, who left him of her own free will, as opposed to, say, Ianto/Lisa, Gwen/Rhys, or Tosh/her mom. This vexes me.
Um. *rereads* The only pattern I really see here is that I tend to be disinterested in generic template characters who don't get developed past being that. And that aside from Rose bloody Tyler, they tend to come in male/female pairs. This is interesting, I hadn't realized that second part about myself before.
(And yes, I know that there are fans of all the characters I mentioned on my flist. Except Dylan. There aren't any Dylan fans on my flist, are there? Anyway, just to note that these are all personal anticharacterkinks and I don't really expect anyone to agree with me, etc. Except about Dylan. Who should have died by the end of the series.)
I use Chronicle icon because there is NO character in The Chronicle who I do not love unconditionally. Except for very minor characters, and even then I don't often actively dislike them. Truth.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
There are exactly two fictional characters that I outright hate. That's Dylan Hunt (Andromeda) and Ana-Lucia Cortez (Lost).
There's a longer list of characters that I dislike or am actively disinterested in. (Is that possible? To be actively disinterested in someone?) Anyway: Rose Tyler (Doctor Who, dislike), Jack Shepherd and Kate Austen (Lost, disinterest), Peter Petrelli and Claire Bennett (Heroes, disinterest), Liz Parker and Max Evans (Roswell, varies depending on the episode), Monica Reyes and John Doggett (The X-Files, disinterest), Gwen Cooper and Owen Harper (Torchwood, disinterest towards Gwen, dislike towards Owen).
...wow, this is the first time that I realized I tend to dislike characters in pairs. And apparently, usually couples that are either canon or popular fanon.
Anyway. Now I'm looking for patterns. Starting with my two top-hated characters, Dylan and Ana-Lucia. What do they have in common? Well, they're both leaders (nominally, anyway). They're both assertive. They both
Dylan's sexually promiscuous and irresponsible. (*cough* Mad to be Saved *cough) Ana-Lucia, on the other hand, is sexually confident but I wouldn't call her promiscuous or particularly irresponsible. She does sleep with Sawyer, which isn't the smartest move in the world to make, but others have made the same mistake before and after her, and it's not like Sawyer's incapable of saying no (unlike, say, Angelika...I really do loathe the episode MtbS). Which makes Dylan worse.
Ana-Lucia is overly reliant on guns. Dylan is overly reliant on
Ana-Lucia killed a character I love (namely, Shannon) and failed to show any particular remorse about it. Dylan offered to help save Earth, failed to actually do anything about it, and failed to show any particular remorse. Draw.
There are superficial alt-gender parallels drawn in the text for both of them. Beka could be considered a female Dylan with fewer moral compunctions. The reason this doesn't hold up is that Beka, while sexually confident and certainly more promiscuous than Ana-Lucia, has never slept with someone who was incapable of saying no, and usually manages to find a better way of comforting Harper than "Well, lots more people are dying and it's all your fault LOLS." Ana-Lucia has often been referred to as the female counterpart of Sawyer, and that's a much closer comparison. It falls down, of course, when you realize that Sawyer is presented as a criminal with a dubious moral compass, and Ana-Lucia is presented as a cop who presumably understands the difference between right and wrong. This bothers me. I think if Ana-Lucia had not been a cop I could have understood her killing that guy in flashback more. Anyway, that's a draw.
Which works out to Dylan being worse than Ana-Lucia. Which means either a) gender plays no role in my anticharacter biases, b) I'm predisposed to dislike men more than women, or c) Dylan was written worse. Reading
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
That's fairly straightforward, right?
Now, the characters I dislike/am disinterested in.
Rose Tyler (dislike): I could tell you it's because the rabid, batshit part of Rose's fanbase turned me off her, but the truth is I dislike Rose because she was mean to Mickey and I overidentify with Mickey, so she was therefore mean to me. And I'm twenty and I hold grudges.
Jack Shepherd and Kate Austen (disinterest): They're so...generic. I don't actually know. Jack is Well Meaning Doctor Who Had Demons In His Past. Kate is Well Meaning Fugitive With Heart Of Gold. Or something. Kate particularly feels inconsistent to me, especially when placed against Claire, Shannon, and Sun, whose personalities I actually understand? Sun deciding to cheat on Jin because he had changed since their marriage felt human to me. Claire deciding to give up her baby because she didn't want to be a single mother was understandable. Shannon losing out on all her dreams and turning to conning Boone for revenge on Sabrina was sad but it made sense. Kate deciding to kill her stepfather because OMG he's actually her biological dad and I CAN'T STAND SHARING GENES WITH YOU!!1!...um...not so much with the understandable. Jack doesn't have anything that ridiculous to excuse, but his only motive seems to be to fix people because he can't fix himself which...doesn't sit well with me, because people should have more complicated motives than that.
Peter Petrelli and Claire Bennett (disinterest): Again with the generic. Also, Peter is emo and rarely seems to accomplish anything, while Claire is your basic cookie-cutter Cheerleader With A Secret.
Liz Parker and Max Evans (varies): When Kyle and Tess (or Alex and Isabel, or Michael and Maria) are doing something interesting/awesome, then I am disinterested in Liz and Max. When Tess is asking "What happens now, Max?" or Kyle is stalking Liz or Maria and Michael are whining about how they want to be Max and Liz, then I actively dislike them. Because the rest of the characters are fairly awesome (and OMG why did they make Emilie de Ravin leave???) and Max and Liz are...generic Romeo & Juliet with alien angst pastede on yay! And Romeo and Juliet were stupid teenagers who let themselves be ruled by hormones. Not one of my favorite character templates.
Monica Reyes and John Doggett (disinterest): Plain, simple, what-happened-to-the-show-I-signed-on-for? I actually never gave Doggett and Reyes a shot on their own terms, and I can admit it. I also never really intend to. I signed on for Mulder, Scully, the Gunmen, and aliens. Not Reyes and Doggett.
Gwen Cooper and Owen Harper (disinterest towards Gwen, dislike towards Owen): Gwen is a fairly personality-less template character. The Heart Of The Team Who Humanizes Them. Aside from her affair. Cheating on Rhys was possibly a sound dramatic choice to make, as it gave her a dimension outside of The Heart Of The Team Who Humanizes Them, but c'mon, Rhys is nearly as awesome as Mickey and deserved better. Owen I actively dislike because...first of all, the alien pheremones in the first episode. Date rape jokes are not funny, and the fact that he never got any dramatic comeuppance drives me crazy. And then there's his heartlessness towards Tosh (Need a hand getting it up? If I did, I wouldn't ask you.) and Tosh I adore. And then he rips open the Rift for someone he barely knew, who left him of her own free will, as opposed to, say, Ianto/Lisa, Gwen/Rhys, or Tosh/her mom. This vexes me.
Um. *rereads* The only pattern I really see here is that I tend to be disinterested in generic template characters who don't get developed past being that. And that aside from Rose bloody Tyler, they tend to come in male/female pairs. This is interesting, I hadn't realized that second part about myself before.
(And yes, I know that there are fans of all the characters I mentioned on my flist. Except Dylan. There aren't any Dylan fans on my flist, are there? Anyway, just to note that these are all personal anticharacterkinks and I don't really expect anyone to agree with me, etc. Except about Dylan. Who should have died by the end of the series.)
I use Chronicle icon because there is NO character in The Chronicle who I do not love unconditionally. Except for very minor characters, and even then I don't often actively dislike them. Truth.
Tags:
no subject
Sorry. Your post deserved a better comment than that. But I do like Claire.
no subject
I don't actively dislike her, if that helps. I just like other characters so much better.
no subject
That might be spillover from me having a crush on Hayden Panettiere, though.
[It's not that creepy, she's barely any younger than I am, seriously.]
no subject
I can't argue with that. That's a totally legit reason to like a character--I think the main reason I love Tess so much is because she's played by Emilie de Ravin and I very much have a crush on Emilie. She's five years older than me, that's not creepy at all! Although she's straight and I'm asexual so that probably wouldn't work out very well.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's rarer that I look at the characters I don't like in detail, but it turns up interesting thoughts.
no subject
Don't I know it.
I'm going to have to ponder on this. Both character likes and dislikes, because now I'd like to try to figure out what sort of archtypes I'm going for or getting turned off of.
no subject
no subject
Of course, there's one of those in every fandom, practically. It borders on cliche.
no subject
*needs to stop thinking right now*
Is "snarky bastard" even an archetype? I figure it's just a part of some other headings now.
I think may have come to an epiphany though. First of all, what I like or dislike in a male character and what I like in a female character are different. (Which is odd, but okay.)
What I Like:
Male: Snarky, questionable morals, seedy pasts, generally a bastard to all but a few people OR gregarious, bouncy, hyperactive, comic relief-type characters who can still be strong and daring when they have to be. (And somehow I can't figure out where Desmond falls into this, because he's one of my favorite characters of all time, and he doesn't really fit into a niche.)
Female: Strong, independent, but still vulnerable when it comes to certain things. Generally able to beat the crap out of the guys when it comes down to it.
What I Dislike:
Male: "Deep Blue Hero" types who have never done a single bad thing in their life or if they have, they angst about to the point that it's sickening.
Female: Whiny, overly dramatic, bratty types who cling to the hero all the time and never try to stand up for themself OR selfish women who use other people unfairly to get what they want.
Incidentally, because of my shipper nature, there are characters whom I don't particularly care for alone, but when combined with another character whom they have chemistry with, I love. (That's sort of how I see Rose, I guess.)
Re: *needs to stop thinking right now*
"Deep Blue Hero" types who have never done a single bad thing in their life or if they have, they angst about to the point that it's sickening.
*epiphany* This is what the Andromeda writers wanted Dylan to be, isn't it? And instead he wound up being a total ass because the later writers catered to KS's ego instead of good writing. But they wanted him to be a Deep Blue Hero!
...I think I still would have hated him if that had actually happened.
Re: *needs to stop thinking right now*
See that's what I love about Desmond- he's a variation on several things. I can stand him being all heroic, because he's not so... I dunno, "in your face" about it? (That's my problem with "Deep Blue Heroes"- they're always "I'm such a hero- ooh! Look at me! I save the daaaaay!")
XD I know plenty of characters that turn out like that. (Hell, I think Jack of LOST fame has turned into that sort of ass, because he really is a jerk at times, and not in my fun way.)
Re: *needs to stop thinking right now*
Jack is an ass at times. I agree. XD But he's not as bad as Dylan! At least, I don't think Jack would sleep with a girl after being explicitly told that she was mentally unstable, may have killed someone, and not coherent enough to tell him no. ...I'm sorry, I really, rabidly hate Dylan.
no subject
And yes. Dylan should have died. ::sighs::
no subject
no subject
no subject
This belief makes me feel better.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Oh and at the same time they have to accept the fact that at any moment one could be killed.
no subject
no subject
Which is how in the last two episodes they're alright with fighting seperately. They do what they can to protect each other, as well as trying to balance that with getting to their goal, and that's all they can do. Also there'd be the element of 'well we haven't died yet' bravery.
Similar thing would have happened with Jake and Ricky. sorta 'we're fighting for freedom. When we're safe we can be in love, during battle we have to actually fight and try our best' thing going. But then the Doctor and Rose or the Doctor and Martha would h ave the same problem really. One of them could die at any stage, and the other is left alone and mourning. Yet they do it anyway.
no subject
Every character on that show=love. And even though I didn't know most of the fandoms, I read a lot of this post, and it was interesting, not boring ^_^ I agree with you about generic characters--I tend to dislike and/or be disinterested in them. I don't see the point of telling a story about a character so generic they could be inserted into anything.
no subject
And why is it that most stories cast the generic character template as the hero, and all the awesome, quirky, interesting characters as the support? That fails to make sense to me.
no subject
Actually having the sidekick telling the story rather than the hero would be heaps interesting. :D
I'm also loving the Chronicle, though I've still not downloaded all the episodes let alone watched them all. I think I've seen 10 and downloaded 20...
no subject
no subject
Mickey's a sweetheart, and more dependable than most of the other characters. I like Rose, but I hated the way the show handled the Rose/Mickey/Doctor angst. I don't even see why they felt the need to add a "love triangle" to the show.
no subject
no subject
This bothers me a lot, if you couldn't tell.
no subject
Ha! Okay, I just got coffee all over my screen.
I really agree with this because of some posts I saw in a Rose fan journal thing. Every time (this series) Martha would do awesome things (door codes, SAVE EARTH! etc), these people would be like 'Zomg Rose could have so done that better!!1one'. Seriously, Could Rose of walked the Earth for a year spread the word of Doctor? No, she would of given up, or died, or run crying to Mickey (who would have saved the world).
Rose was character I liked at first because she was a good match to 9's 'My peoples are gone and I iz sulking and don't like being nice'. I could of forgiven her for being mean to Mickey in series 1, but it just kept happening. I really think they should of brought in a replacement for Rose much sooner after DT joined the show.
...
I have way more to say but I'm moving house right now and moving the router, byes! *kiss*
no subject
Rose&Nine worked, mainly because Nine was emotionally messed up enough to need someone who would forgive him for things and treat him like a good person despite his messed-up-ness. Ten got...not past that, exactly, but he dealt with it differently, and he really needed somebody who would ground him, not enable him.
Have fun. *mwah*
no subject
Uhmm there was something else I wanted to add. Don't kill me till you've read the whole thing :P.
Dylan Hunt. Dylan was awesome imo. A slightly glorified hero thrown out of his time and into a world completely different to what he was used to. I really think most people would have lost it there. But Dylan decided to fight it and restore peace and order. He recruits the mis-fit space crew, realising that while they look and are completely dodgy, he can trust them.
Then, somewhere on the World Ship, Dylan was kidnapped and replaced by a idiot who lets his dick do the thinking. He treated Beka like crap, bullied Harper, alienated Tyr possibly his most powerful ally and ignored what Trance was really trying to say and worst of all, screwed over Earth, a planet which could of united a hell of a lot of people.
And then, there was Rommie. I cannot believe that we watched Andromeda for 5 years and nothing was done about Rommie and her thing for Dylan. It needed to be resolved because Rommie/Harper SHOULD be canon it was so obvious.
I really don't know who to blame for Dylan Hunt, it seems wrong to blame Kevin Sorbo but I really don't know. I do think though, that if Dylan had been written out of the show and Beka placed in charge, Andromeda would still be on the air. I personally stopped watching the show because Dylan was had a new fuck buddy each week.
GRRRR!
no subject
Then Robert left, and all that potential went out the window. And I wish he had died. And I blame Kevin Sorbo, among others.
Also, Rommie/Harper SHOULD have been canon. Canon Rommie/Harper would have made up for every bad thing ever.